Share an idea

Send an informal idea privately

This is a direct, private contact route—not the planned public Ideas Lab moderation queue. Sending a message does not promise a response, publication, review or adoption. Please do not include sensitive personal information.

Later phase: three questions

When submissions launch, the initial form will ask only three required questions:

1. What's the problem? Describe the outcome, barrier or experience that needs attention.
2. What would you do? State the proposed change clearly enough for someone else to examine it.
3. Why would it help? Explain the reasoning, likely effects and any evidence you think matters.

There will be no profile setup or unrelated questions. We will explain the minimum data needed, its use, the moderation rules and what happens next before submission. Spam controls will not rely on inaccessible puzzles, and an alternative contact method will remain available.

From submission to decision

1. Submitted: received and awaiting an initial check; submission will not mean publication or endorsement.
2. Under review: moderators assess relevance, clarity, duplication, safety and evidence, and may seek clarification.
3. Adopted: selected for policy development, with the reasons and next step explained; adoption will not itself mean an immediate manifesto commitment.
4. Rejected: not taken forward, with a visible explanation of the reasoning and evidence considered.
5. Archived: retained as a record when superseded, inactive or no longer current, with its prior status preserved.

Status changes should be understandable and attributable to the published process. Moderation criteria and the route to challenge a factual mistake or moderation decision will be shown before anyone submits.

Moderation without hiding disagreement

Moderation will remove unlawful material, threats, targeted abuse, unnecessary personal information and spam, and may combine clear duplicates. Criticism and disagreement will not be rejected merely because they are uncomfortable. Where editing is needed for safety or clarity, the page should say what changed and why.

Published views are planned for New, Under review, Adopted and Rejected, with Popular available as one way to explore—not as a score that determines the result. Support and challenge can help reviewers see interest and counterarguments, but popularity will never be the sole adoption criterion.

Rejection must remain inspectable

A rejected proposal will display Why we rejected it. That explanation will identify the relevant criterion, the reasoning, material evidence considered and, where appropriate, what change or new evidence could alter the assessment.

The original argument, rejection status and explanation should remain available unless safety, law or privacy requires removal. This makes rejection a decision that can be questioned and corrected, rather than a tribal signal or a silent disappearance.